Aravind Malagatti
Sunday, 11 October 2020
Saturday, 24 October 2015
Response to the appeal
I welcome the decision taken by the Akademi in protest of Dr.M.M.Kalburgis assassination.Akademi has appealed the writers to take back the awards and to withdraw the resignations.Personally I am not ready to take back my resignation.Our move is a symbolic protest against the growing fundamentalism.We want to bring awareness among the people against these anti-social,anti-constitutional activities.We have done it,to a small extent.We Indians must grow zero tolerance to such things.We want to give this message to the people of this country.
-Dr.Aravind Malagatti
-Dr.Aravind Malagatti
Wednesday, 21 October 2015
Replying the appeal given by Sahithya Akademi
I have
noticed your letter. It is a welcome note that a meeting is convened on 23rd November by the Akademi. Anyway, it is late. Dr.M.M.Kalaburgi
had experienced lots of backlash due to his Literature, Research and Speeches.
He uses to ignore threatening calls and intimidating letters. He suggested me
to ignore such letters- when I started getting similar ones. Therefore, I tore
away such letters initially. Whenever there was a threatening call, the mobile
phone would be like a fireball. The entire home has suffered due to tension.
Stopping our programs, by seeing that function halls are not allotted to our
programs, speaking over the T.V Challnels that they would cut our tongues,
break our legs & hands and so on.
Then only I could understand the
pain & turmoil of Prof.Kalburgi. It is then I could feel the pain of Shri.
Pansare & Dabholkar….. If you
had ever experienced such situations, you wouldn’t react so. (Those who
criticise through media, those who brand our move as politically motivated will
never understand this.) I hope that such situations should not haunt even these
criticisers.I love my country.
The country’s top most literary
body, must never reach the non existent state. It should utilise the freedom
and authority bestowed on it. I resigned
to the memebership of the Akademi, with the strong wish that the Akademi would
show that, it is not for just literature. I
thank you all for the co-operation extended to me during my membership.
-
Aravinda Malagatti
Sunday, 11 October 2015
Resignation to General Council Membership of Sahithya Akademi
I
have tendered my resignation to the general council membership of Sahithya
Akademi, Delhi on 11-10-2015 at 8 am, through e mail, in protest of Dr. M. M.
Kalaburgi’s assassination. Resignation letter is sent to the president of the Akademi,
Shri Vishwanath Prasad Tiwari and secretary Shri Srinivasarao. I have attached the copy of my
resignation letter.
Prof.
Aravind Malagatti
Shri
Vishvanath Prasad thivariji,
FirojShah Road,
Honourable
president of Sahithya Akademi,
Ravindra Bhavan, 35, New Delhi, 110001
Respected
sir,
Dr. M M
Kalburgi’s assassination is a clear attack on freedom of expression. I am
tendering my resignation to the general council membership of the Akademi.
Honourable president is requested to accept my resignation.
Akademi
should have given a statement opposing this immediately. Post incident approval
could be obtained at a later date by placing it before the executive board .
President surely has this discretionary power in any institution. This wouldn’t
bring down Akademi’s honour, rather uphold it. Dr. Kalburgi is an awardee of
Sahithya Akademi. Moreover he has served the Akademi as a member too. Defending
freedom of expression must be Akademi’s priority.It is my personal opinion . Honourable president is requested to accept
my resignation.
Thanking
you
Yours sincerely
Prof
Aravind Malagatti
Thursday, 19 February 2015
Reply to a journalist regarding bhagavadgitha
Bhagavadgitha – discussion-Aravind Malagatti
Dear Mr. Shreyas,
I said I would call you after a
while, when you called me. Later I saw
missed calls from your side. I
am sorry that I could not pick the call then. Here are my answers to your
questions.
Regards- Aravind
malagatti
1 With your studies on Geeta, do you believe BG strongly
propagates sectarianism?
-yes, Bhagvadgeeta does
a job of sowing the seeds of sectarianism(varna) in the readers
mind and preaches inequality. Caste system is the product of varnashrama, which
lord Krishna claims to have created.- Chaturvarnyam maya srushtyam guna karma vibhagasha-
[4-13]
2 According to Hindu scholars Geeta preaches perfect way of life
for the universe, what is your take on it?
-
Of course, it preaches the perfect way of life
– jeevana dharma , for one sect of
Hindus. Way of thinking of other sects have not been taken in its fold.
3 What is your interpretation of chapter 4, verse 13, a line of
which says, caste is determined by character and works not by birth
(chaturvrana maya sisthtam gunadharma vibhagasah)?
The shloka is not
clear in its connotation. There are three gunas , satva, raja, and thama. On the
basis of these three, there are four
varnas! There are six karmas[shatkarmas] adhyayana, adhyapana, Yajna, yajana,
dana, pratigraha.[these are meant for Brahmins] .what combinations of these
must have resulted in four varnas?
Lord Krishna suggests hierarchy
in gunas. [14-8].Same hierarchy is implied in varnas also. Jatidharma and
kuladharmas are also mentioned in bhagavadgita.[1-42]
4 Can slow evolving of Indian society attributed to inculcating
teachings of Geeta in way of life. Can this deeply rooted cast system in India
eradicated?
Geetha was not known to many hindus, as
education was denied to shudras and women. Popularizing it now will hinder the
progress of the society. There are folk ramayanas and folk mahabharathas , but
not folk geetha, indicating that it was not popular among the common people.
Caste system can be eradicated
through intercaste marriages. But, bhagavadgitha opposes varnasankara.
5 What are the impacts the modern Indian society is bearing due
to Geeta’s teaching?
Geetha contains
certain good preachings also, that
should be practiced , instead of reciting. But contents regarding hierarchy of varnas and
subordination of women, vaishyas and
shudras should never impact the society.
6 Has Geeta still remained as a book of upper cast, specifically
Brahmins, in terms of interpretation of Sholkas of Geeta?
-Geetha doesn’t
contain way of thinking of non Brahmins.
7 Do you feel, in the rapid socio cultural changes due to
information age, Brahmins in future
retain control over interpretations of Geeta?
-As a book, it has to be interpreted by all
interested people. There is no question of retaining control over the
interpretation.
8 Is Geeta not at all worth reading in the present context of
social life?
- It is worth, excepting the contradictory issues in it.
9 Is it true or you believe, in the argument of Kedar Joshi, who
says Geeta is nothing but the example of Hindu terrorism?
-
I have not read Kedar Joshi.
10 The views that lower cast, who have sinful birth go to the
highest goal in the shelter of Krishna is shear symbol of slavery?
-
Going to the highest
goal is not a symbol of slavery. But identification of women, vaishyas and
shudras as those of sinful birth is questionable. [refer 9-32]
11 Who is this Krishna, by the way? Brahmins’ creation to hold
monopoly of knowledge and economy
-Monopoly of knowledge
and economy can’t be held through religious texts.
12 Is it time of the
youths of India to renounce all religious scripts?
-Definitely not.
Nothing is useless. Retain all old, religious works in order to understand the
lapses in them and to construct new and relevant way of life.
Wednesday, 26 March 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)